Hong Kong Hiking Web:
相關興趣 Related Interest:
| By 滿足 on Sunday, November 16, 2003 - 10:34 am: Edit
| By PSG-1 on Monday, November 17, 2003 - 4:26 pm: Edit
yes, I am agree.
| By ngu on Thursday, November 20, 2003 - 11:17 pm: Edit
| By 三文魚子 on Thursday, November 20, 2003 - 11:49 pm: Edit
| By 睇你唔起 on Friday, November 21, 2003 - 11:33 pm: Edit
又要拗,真係煩,你就真係唔浪漫啦, 浪漫好主觀架, 你依個機械仔係無法領會跳的. 唉, 可悲, 同人講浪漫. 哈哈
| By 一路人 on Friday, November 21, 2003 - 11:46 pm: Edit
I AGREE WITH NGU, 咁是「寫意」不是「浪漫」。
| By ngu on Saturday, November 22, 2003 - 9:49 pm: Edit
| By $_$ on Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 9:00 pm: Edit
| By JAMES on Thursday, December 04, 2003 - 10:52 pm: Edit
| By 浪漫 on Friday, December 05, 2003 - 8:21 pm: Edit
| By 一路人 on Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 1:44 am: Edit
I agree with Ngu on this topic doesn't mean I support him in all aspects. Please understand that we are discussing here on the case not on the person. You don't like him is another thing ( I don't like flying planes either )
| By 肥針 on Saturday, December 06, 2003 - 11:47 pm: Edit
I think in the majority of times, ngu's messages invite many people to fight with him, maybe due to his 'logic' and more due to his attitude.
However, in this thread, it's just that the interpretation of 'romance' in the original mail is quite different from the common understanding. In fact, I looked up the dictionary and tried to find a meaing of the word that matches what '滿足' said (as I'm no fan of ngu neither) but I can't find one.
As 一路人 said, let's discuss on the topic and not on the person.
Let's save the time that's spent in guessing who is playing with fake names.
Peace of mind to everybody.
| By ngu on Monday, January 26, 2004 - 12:40 pm: Edit
| By lc on Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 5:59 pm: Edit